Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo U7600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo U7600

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 60% higher turbo clock speed
Much better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 257.82 fps vs 36.45 fps More than 7x better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score
Much better performance per watt 17.52 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 4x better performance per watt
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,148 vs 534 More than 4x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.51 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 5,582 vs 1,863 Around 3x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,109 More than 2.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 6 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo U7600 vs Celeron J1900

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo U7600
29.54 mHash/s
Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core2 Duo U7600
26.5 mPixels/s
Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo U7600
1.67 fps
Celeron J1900
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo U7600
51,300 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo U7600  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core2 Duo U7600  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.51 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.51 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 17.52 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W
Intel Core2 Duo U7600
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus