Intel Core2 Duo U7600 vs Celeron J1900 |
Released April, 2007
Intel Core2 Duo U7600
- 1.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo U7600
 | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz | | Much better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 257.82 fps |
| | Much better performance per watt 17.52 pt/W | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,148 |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Celeron J1900
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 |
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core2 Duo U7600CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 60% higher turbo clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score | 257.82 fps | vs | 36.45 fps | More than 7x better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 17.52 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | More than 4x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,148 | vs | 534 | More than 4x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.51 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,582 | vs | 1,863 | Around 3x better PassMark score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,887 | vs | 1,109 | More than 2.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Apr, 2007 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo U7600 vs Celeron J1900
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo U7600 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 688 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 854 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Core2 Duo U7600 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.51 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.51 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 17.52 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W | |
 Intel Core2 Duo U7600  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron J1900 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $125 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $94 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $72 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1037U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs J3455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1007U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
