CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of U7600 vs G1820 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo U7600 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo U7600  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo U7600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo U7600

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 17.52 pt/W vs 2.59 pt/W More than 6.8x better performance per watt
Much better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 257.82 fps vs 92.78 fps More than 2.8x better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 43.88W 5.4x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 72 °C Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Slightly more l3 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Better PassMark score 5,582 vs 2,773 More than 2x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.51 GHz vs 2.79 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 13.01 $/year 5.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 47.3 $/year 5.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1820

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1820

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,896 vs 1,109 More than 3.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better geekbench 3 single core score 2,149 vs 645 More than 3.2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 6 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo U7600 vs Celeron G1820

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo U7600
29.54 mHash/s
Celeron G1820
7.87 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core2 Duo U7600
26.5 mPixels/s
Celeron G1820
10.03 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo U7600
1.67 fps
Celeron G1820
0.61 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo U7600
51,300 MB/s
Celeron G1820
154,300 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo U7600  vs
Celeron G1820 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
479
LGA 1150

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 54W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 47.3 $/year
Performance per watt 17.52 pt/W 2.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 43.88W

details

Core2 Duo U7600  vs
Celeron G1820 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 27
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.51 GHz 2.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.51 GHz 2.79 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A HD (Haswell)
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Core2 Duo U7600
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1820
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus