CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T9900 vs 460M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo T9900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo T9900  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T9900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T9900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 2.53 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.95 pt/$ vs 1.74 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.38 GHz vs 2.98 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,222 vs 1,077 Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz vs 2.77 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i5 460M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 460M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Marginally newer Sep, 2010 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9900 vs Core i5 460M

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T9900  vs
Core i5 460M 
Clock speed 3.06 GHz 2.53 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
479
P
BGA 1288
Is hyperthreaded No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 500 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 766 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Core2 Duo T9900  vs
Core i5 460M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms
Transistor count 410,000,000 382,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 19

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.38 GHz 2.98 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz 2.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.38 GHz 2.98 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 11.18 pt/W 11.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W
Intel Core2 Duo T9900
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 460M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus