0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9600 vs P7450 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T9600
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T9600
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T9600 vs P7450 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the P7450 vs the T9600. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9600 vs P7450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9600
2,748
Core2 Duo P7450
2,093
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9600
1,532
Core2 Duo P7450
1,179
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9600
114,200 MB/s
Core2 Duo P7450
87,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9600
2,559
Core2 Duo P7450
1,974
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9600
2,757
Core2 Duo P7450
2,204
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T9600
4,085
Core2 Duo P7450
3,380
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9600
1,928
Core2 Duo P7450
1,426
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9600
1,078
Core2 Duo P7450
833
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9600 | vs | P7450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.34 pt/W | 3.57 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T9600 | vs | P7450 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 7 | |
Voltage range | 1.05 - 1.21V | 1.05 - 1.15V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.05 GHz | 2.68 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 430.7 | 505.6 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.05 GHz | 2.68 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T9600 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P7450 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $316 | |
2557M vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | ||
P9600 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $316 | |
P8600 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | ||
T9900 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $316 | |
P8400 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | ||
P9700 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $316 | |
520M vs T9600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||