Intel Core2 Duo T9550 vs T6600 |
Released December, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T9550
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T9550
 | Supports trusted computing Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T6600 vs the T9550. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9550 vs T6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9550 | vs | T6600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| P | |||
| 478 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.17 pt/W | 2.6 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 800 MHz | |
details | Core2 Duo T9550 | vs | T6600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 10 | 11 | |
| Voltage range | 1.05 - 1.21V | 1 - 1.25V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.29 GHz | 3.27 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.29 GHz | 3.27 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo T9550  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo T6600 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| T4500 vs T6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $209 | ||
| P8700 vs T6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $316 | ||
| T9600 vs T6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | ||
| T4400 vs T6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| 520M vs T6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3120M vs T6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $316 | $150 | |
| T9600 vs T9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
