0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9550 vs P8700 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T9550 vs the P8700. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the P8700 vs the T9550. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9550 vs P8700
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9550
2,636
Core2 Duo P8700
2,487
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9550
1,468
Core2 Duo P8700
1,395
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9550
108,800 MB/s
Core2 Duo P8700
103,300 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9550
2,445
Core2 Duo P8700
2,318
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9550
2,661
Core2 Duo P8700
2,628
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T9550
4,398
Core2 Duo P8700
3,995
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9550
1,792
Core2 Duo P8700
1,639
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9550
1,014
Core2 Duo P8700
999
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9550 | vs | P8700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.17 pt/W | 4.22 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T9550 | vs | P8700 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 1.05 - 1.21V | 1 - 1.25V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.29 GHz | 2.88 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.29 GHz | 2.88 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T9550 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P8700 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $225 | |
P8700 vs 350M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $316 | |
P8700 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $364 | |
P8700 vs P9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $331 | |
P8700 vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $211 | |
P8700 vs P8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $378 | |
P8700 vs 3632QM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $30 | |
P8700 vs 520M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||