0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9500 vs T8100 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T9500 vs the T8100. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T8100 vs the T9500. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9500 vs T8100
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9500
2,548
Core2 Duo T8100
2,042
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9500
1,423
Core2 Duo T8100
1,164
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9500
106,450 MB/s
Core2 Duo T8100
85,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9500
2,413
Core2 Duo T8100
1,925
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9500
2,670
Core2 Duo T8100
1,997
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T9500
4,087
Core2 Duo T8100
2,994
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9500
1,823
Core2 Duo T8100
1,291
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9500
1,051
Core2 Duo T8100
828
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9500 | vs | T8100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.88 pt/W | 2.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T9500 | vs | T8100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.25V | 1 - 1.25V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.13 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.13 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T9500 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T8100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $197 | |
T7500 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | ||
T7300 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $197 | |
T9300 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | ||
T9300 vs T9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
X9000 vs T9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T7500 vs T9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | ||
T9550 vs T9500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||