0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9400 vs P8400 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T9400 vs the P8400. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the P8400 vs the T9400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9400 vs P8400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
2,521
Core2 Duo P8400
2,231
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
1,407
Core2 Duo P8400
1,251
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
103,400 MB/s
Core2 Duo P8400
95,500 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
2,328
Core2 Duo P8400
2,110
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
2,679
Core2 Duo P8400
2,328
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T9400
4,090
Core2 Duo P8400
3,641
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9400
1,736
Core2 Duo P8400
1,457
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9400
991
Core2 Duo P8400
902
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9400 | vs | P8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.54 pt/W | 3.83 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T9400 | vs | P8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 1.05 - 1.16V | 1.05 - 1.15V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.54 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 2.54 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T9400 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P8400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $331 | |
P8700 vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $331 | |
3220 vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $331 | |
520M vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $331 | |
P8600 vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $211 | |
350M vs P8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $211 | |
3210M vs P8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | $211 | |
T9600 vs P8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||