0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9400 vs Core i5 520M |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 520M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 520M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T9400 vs the Core i5 520M. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9400 vs Core i5 520M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
2,521
Core i5 520M
3,737
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
1,407
Core i5 520M
1,867
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
103,400 MB/s
Core i5 520M
1,340,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
2,328
Core i5 520M
3,593
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9400
2,679
Core i5 520M
4,110
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T9400
4,090
Core i5 520M
5,349
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9400
1,736
Core i5 520M
2,380
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9400
991
Core i5 520M
1,058
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9400 | vs | Core i5 520M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
rPGA 988A | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.54 pt/W | 13.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Duo T9400 | vs | Core i5 520M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 18 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 766 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Duo T9400 ![]() | Intel Core i5 520M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $30 | |
Intel Core i5 2520M vs 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$259 | $30 | |
Intel Core i7 620M vs i5 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $30 | |
Intel Core2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$346 | $30 | |
Intel Core i7 640M vs i5 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $30 | |
Intel Core i5 560M vs 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $30 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Core i5 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$235 | $30 | |
Intel Core i5 3320M vs 520M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||