CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T9400 vs 3320M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T9400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T9400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T9400 vs the Core i5 3320M.

Front view of Intel Core i5 3320M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3320M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9400 vs Core i5 3320M

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo T9400
21.42 fps
Core i5 3320M
123.42 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo T9400
0.48 fps
Core i5 3320M
6.8 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo T9400
103,400 MB/s
Core i5 3320M
2,140,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T9400  vs
Core i5 3320M 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
478
P
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 2.54 pt/W 12.64 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

details

Core2 Duo T9400  vs
Core i5 3320M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 26

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 3.08 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 3.08 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo T9400
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3320M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus