0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9300 vs T8300 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T9300 vs the T8300. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T8300 vs the T9300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9300 vs T8300
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core2 Duo T9300
19.93 fps
Core2 Duo T8300
15.81 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,459
Core2 Duo T8300
2,322
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
1,376
Core2 Duo T8300
1,315
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
102,200 MB/s
Core2 Duo T8300
98,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,294
Core2 Duo T8300
2,095
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,640
Core2 Duo T8300
2,408
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9300
1,667
Core2 Duo T8300
1,480
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9300
974
Core2 Duo T8300
936
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | T8300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.73 pt/W | 2.58 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | T8300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.25V | 1 - 1.25V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.69 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T8300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | ||
T9500 vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $309 | |
T7700 vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $309 | |
T7500 vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $309 | |
3110M vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | $309 | |
T8100 vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $236 | |
T7700 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $236 | |
T7500 vs T8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Zatoİchi (02:04 PM, January 9, 2017)