0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9300 vs T7700 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T9300 vs the T7700. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T7700 vs the T9300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9300 vs T7700
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core2 Duo T9300
19.93 fps
Core2 Duo T7700
17.73 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,459
Core2 Duo T7700
2,315
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
1,376
Core2 Duo T7700
1,299
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
102,200 MB/s
Core2 Duo T7700
98,100 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,294
Core2 Duo T7700
2,100
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,640
Core2 Duo T7700
1,815
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9300
1,667
Core2 Duo T7700
9,386
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9300
974
Core2 Duo T7700
2,082
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | T7700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.73 pt/W | 5.71 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | T7700 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.69 GHz | 2.71 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | 2.71 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T7700 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $236 | |
T9300 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | ||
T9300 vs T9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $236 | |
T9300 vs T7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $80 | |
T9300 vs 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $197 | |
T9300 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | ||
T9300 vs T7800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $236 | |
T7700 vs T8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||