Winner
Intel Core2 Duo T9300
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo T9300 based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core2 Duo T9300 vs T7700 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 1.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T9300 vs the T7700. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T7700 vs the T9300. | |||||||
summary | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | T7700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| P | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.74 pt/W | 5.72 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
details | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | T7700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.69 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T9300 | Intel Core2 Duo T7700 |
| VS | |
| 70 € | 80 € | |
| T9300 vs T9500 | ||
| VS | |
| 70 € | 19 € | |
| T9300 vs T8300 | ||
| VS | |
| 70 € | 10 € | |
| T9300 vs T7500 | ||
| VS | |
| 70 € | 76 € | |
| T9300 vs 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| 70 € | 18 € | |
| T9300 vs T4500 | ||
| VS | |
| 70 € | 18 € | |
| T9300 vs T8100 | ||
| VS | |
| 45 € | 19 € | |
| T7700 vs T8300 | ||
| VS | |
| 573 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
| VS | |
| 268 € | 150 € | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| VS | |
| 573 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| VS | |
| 511 € | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| VS | |
| 398 € | 511 € | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | 997 € | |
| 5200U vs 7410 | ||
| VS | |
| 573 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7200U | ||