0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T9300 vs Core i3 3110M |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3110M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3110M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T9300 vs the Core i3 3110M. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T9300 vs Core i3 3110M
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core2 Duo T9300
19.93 fps
Core i3 3110M
104.44 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,459
Core i3 3110M
3,982
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
1,376
Core i3 3110M
1,851
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
102,200 MB/s
Core i3 3110M
125,500 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,294
Core i3 3110M
3,856
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T9300
2,640
Core i3 3110M
4,185
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T9300
1,667
Core i3 3110M
3,042
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T9300
974
Core i3 3110M
1,214
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | Core i3 3110M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.73 pt/W | 3.71 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Duo T9300 | vs | Core i3 3110M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 24 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.69 GHz | 2.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,272.8 | 1,197.2 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | 2.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3110M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
3110M vs 4500M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $161 | |
3110M vs N3530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
3110M vs 6210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $134 | |
3110M vs 2020M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $225 | |
3110M vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $161 | |
3110M vs N3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $225 | |
3110M vs 3230M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||