0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T8300 vs Celeron 900 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T8300
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T8300
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 900 vs the Core2 Duo T8300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T8300 vs Celeron 900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T8300
2,322
Celeron 900
1,094
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T8300
1,315
Celeron 900
1,102
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T8300
98,000 MB/s
Celeron 900
88,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T8300
2,095
Celeron 900
1,046
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T8300
3,828
Celeron 900
1,767
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core2 Duo T8300
2,143
Celeron 900
1,000
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T8300
1,480
Celeron 900
678
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T8300
936
Celeron 900
782
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T8300 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.58 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Duo T8300 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.53 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo T8300 ![]() | Intel Celeron 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $309 | |
T8300 vs T7700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $309 | |
T8300 vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $236 | |
T8300 vs T7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T8300 vs T9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T8300 vs T4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $197 | |
T8300 vs T7250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T8300 vs T7300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||