Intel Core2 Duo T8100 vs Celeron M 550 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T8100
- 2.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T8100
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Core2 Duo T8100. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T8100 vs Celeron M 550
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T8100 | vs | Celeron M 550 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 0.55 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| P | |||
| 495 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 4W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 0.96 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 3.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 100 MHz | |
details | Core2 Duo T8100 | vs | Celeron M 550 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 0.13 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 180 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.47 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.47 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo T8100  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron M 550 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $236 | $197 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T7500 vs T8100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $197 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo T8100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $197 | ||
| Intel Pentium T4500 vs Core2 Duo T8100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $197 | ||
| Intel Pentium T4300 vs Core2 Duo T8100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $236 | $197 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T8300 vs T8100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $309 | $197 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T9300 vs T8100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $197 | ||
| Intel Core2 Duo T9500 vs T8100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
