CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T7700 vs 3317U

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core i5 3317U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3317U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3317U

Intel Core i5 3317U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T7700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T7700

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 3317U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3317U

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 65 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 28.44W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better performance per watt 24.88 pt/W vs 6.67 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Marginally newer Jun, 2012 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 5 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,232 vs 823 Around 50% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.88 pt/$ vs 0.76 pt/$ Around 2.5x better performance per dollar
Better PassMark score 3,116 vs 1,414 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7700 vs Core i5 3317U

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T7700  vs
Core i5 3317U 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
479
P
BGA 1023
Is hyperthreaded No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 17W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.1 $/year
Performance per watt 6.67 pt/W 24.88 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 13.81W

details

Core2 Duo T7700  vs
Core i5 3317U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nms 22 nms
Transistor count 291,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 17

gpu

GPU None GPU
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo T7700
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3317U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus