0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T7600 vs T7400 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T7600 vs the T7400. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T7400 vs the T7600. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7600 vs T7400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7600
2,224
Core2 Duo T7400
2,067
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7600
1,193
Core2 Duo T7400
1,160
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7600
99.3 MB/s
Core2 Duo T7400
87,400 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7600
2,111
Core2 Duo T7400
1,748
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7600
2,121
Core2 Duo T7400
2,218
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T7600
3,290
Core2 Duo T7400
3,145
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T7600
1,348
Core2 Duo T7400
6,523
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T7600
815
Core2 Duo T7400
1,692
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T7600 | vs | T7400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 34W | 34W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | 8.19 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.49 pt/W | 4.41 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 27.63W | 27.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 667 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T7600 | vs | T7400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 14 | 13 | |
Voltage range | 1.04 - 1.3V | 1.16 - 1.3V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.76 GHz | 2.32 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.33 GHz | 2.92 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.76 GHz | 2.32 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T7600 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T7400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||