CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T7500 vs 425e among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo T7500 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo T7500  based on its performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T7500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T7500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1.5 MB Around 2.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better PassMark score 7,135 vs 2,239 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 36.56W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 4.11 pt/W vs 2.03 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 10.84 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon II X3 425e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X3 425e

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Newer May, 2011 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 4 years later
More cores 3 vs 2 1 more cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7500 vs Athlon II X3 425e

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T7500  vs
Athlon II X3 425e 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Tri core
Socket type
P
479
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

Core2 Duo T7500  vs
Athlon II X3 425e 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 3
L2 cache 4 MB 1.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 35W 45W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 4.11 pt/W 2.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 36.56W
Intel Core2 Duo T7500
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X3 425e
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus