0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T7300 vs P8600 |
VS
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo P8600
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the P8600
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T7300 vs the P8600. | |||||||
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7300 vs P8600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
1,956
Core2 Duo P8600
2,303
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
1,108
Core2 Duo P8600
1,338
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
81,900 MB/s
Core2 Duo P8600
97,400 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
1,803
Core2 Duo P8600
2,197
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
2,037
Core2 Duo P8600
2,608
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T7300
3,340
Core2 Duo P8600
3,788
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T7300
5,169
Core2 Duo P8600
1,541
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T7300
1,867
Core2 Duo P8600
942
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T7300 | vs | P8600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
479 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.61 pt/W | 3.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W |
details | Core2 Duo T7300 | vs | P8600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 9 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.33 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P8600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $130 | |
P8600 vs 3210M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $30 | |
P8600 vs 520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $316 | |
P8600 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $80 | |
P8600 vs 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $331 | |
P8600 vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $10 | |
P8600 vs 330M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $197 | |
P8600 vs T8100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||