0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T7300 vs Core Duo L2400 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T7300 vs the Core Duo L2400. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core Duo L2400 vs the Core2 Duo T7300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7300 vs Core Duo L2400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
1,956
Core Duo L2400
1,327
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
1,108
Core Duo L2400
737
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
81,900 MB/s
Core Duo L2400
67.5 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T7300
1,803
Core Duo L2400
1,275
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T7300
3,340
Core Duo L2400
1,735
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T7300
5,169
Core Duo L2400
705
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T7300
1,867
Core Duo L2400
497
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T7300 | vs | Core Duo L2400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.61 pt/W | 2.36 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 12.19W |
details | Core2 Duo T7300 | vs | Core Duo L2400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 151,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 10 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 1.84 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.33 GHz | 1.84 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 ![]() | Intel Core Duo L2400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||