CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T7200 vs N3050 among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo T7200 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo T7200  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T7200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T7200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T7200 vs the Celeron N3050.

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7200 vs Celeron N3050

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo T7200
80,800 MB/s
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T7200  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 34W 6W
Annual home energy cost 8.19 $/year 1.45 $/year
Performance per watt 2.26 pt/W 8.65 pt/W
Typical power consumption 27.63W 4.88W

details

Core2 Duo T7200  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 320 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo T7200
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus