Intel Core2 Duo T7200 vs AMD Opteron 2216 HE |
Released August, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T7200
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
4.9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T7200
 | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 80,800 MB/s | | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released August, 2006
AMD Opteron 2216 HE
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 2216 HE
| | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz | | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,651 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T7200 vs 2216 HE among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 80,800 MB/s | vs | 55,600 MB/s | More than 45% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 27.63W | vs | 55.25W | 2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.26 pt/W | vs | 1.08 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | vs | 16.38 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 29.78 $/year | vs | 59.57 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 2,651 | vs | 1,908 | Around 40% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7200 vs Opteron 2216 HE
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T7200 | vs | Opteron 2216 HE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| 479 | |||
| F | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 34W | 68W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | 16.38 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 29.78 $/year | 59.57 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.26 pt/W | 1.08 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 27.63W | 55.25W | |
details | Core2 Duo T7200 | vs | Opteron 2216 HE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 12 | |
| Voltage range | 1.04 - 1.3V | 1.2 - UnknownV | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo T7200  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 2216 HE Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $213 | ||
| T7400 vs T7200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $236 | ||
| T7500 vs T7200 | ||
 | VS | |
| T2400 vs T7200 | ||
 | VS | |
| T7600 vs T7200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $177 | ||
| T5500 vs T7200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | ||
| Z3735F vs T7200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| N3050 vs T7200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
