CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T7200 vs 2216 HE among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T7200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T7200

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 80,800 MB/s vs 55,600 MB/s More than 45% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 27.63W vs 55.25W 2x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 2.26 pt/W vs 1.08 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.19 $/year vs 16.38 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 29.78 $/year vs 59.57 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2216 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2216 HE

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,651 vs 1,908 Around 40% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7200 vs Opteron 2216 HE

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo T7200
80,800 MB/s
Opteron 2216 HE
55,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T7200  vs
Opteron 2216 HE 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
478
479
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 34W 68W
Annual home energy cost 8.19 $/year 16.38 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 29.78 $/year 59.57 $/year
Performance per watt 2.26 pt/W 1.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 27.63W 55.25W

details

Core2 Duo T7200  vs
Opteron 2216 HE 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 12 12
Voltage range 1.04 - 1.3V 1.2 - UnknownV

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Core2 Duo T7200
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2216 HE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus