Intel Core2 Duo T7200 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
Released August, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T7200
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T7200
 | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 80,800 MB/s | | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 27.63W | | Higher clock speed 2 GHz |
VS
Released November, 2008
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e
| | Newer Nov, 2008 | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core2 Duo T7200CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 80,800 MB/s | vs | 41.1 MB/s | Around 1966x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 27.63W | vs | 97.88W | 3.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | vs | 40.46 $/year | 4.9x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.26 pt/W | vs | 0.32 pt/W | More than 7x better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 29.78 $/year | vs | 89.18 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Newer | Nov, 2008 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7200 vs Athlon 64 X2 3250e
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T7200 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| 479 | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Core2 Duo T7200 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.48 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 2.48 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 34W | 22W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | 40.46 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 29.78 $/year | 89.18 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.26 pt/W | 0.32 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 27.63W | 97.88W | |
 Intel Core2 Duo T7200  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $177 | ||
| T7200 vs T5500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| T7200 vs T7600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| T7200 vs T2400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $213 | ||
| T7200 vs T7400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | ||
| T7200 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| T7200 vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $241 | ||
| T7200 vs T2500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
