Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T7100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T7100

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,965 vs 813 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better PassMark score 5,527 vs 1,043 More than 5.2x better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 3.61 pt/W vs 1.91 pt/W Around 90% better performance per watt
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz vs 2.01 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G465

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G465

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 1.81 pt/$ vs 0.64 pt/$ More than 2.8x better performance per dollar
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 5 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T7100 vs Celeron G465

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo T7100
80,500 MB/s
Celeron G465
72,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T7100  vs
Celeron G465 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
P
479
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 3.61 pt/W 1.91 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

details

Core2 Duo T7100  vs
Celeron G465 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 19

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.03 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz 2.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.03 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo T7100
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G465
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus