0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T6600 vs P8700 |
VS
Released December, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo P8700
- 2.53 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the P8700
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T6600 vs the P8700. | |||||||
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T6600 vs P8700
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T6600
2,105
Core2 Duo P8700
2,487
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T6600
1,162
Core2 Duo P8700
1,395
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T6600
93,000 MB/s
Core2 Duo P8700
103,300 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T6600
1,962
Core2 Duo P8700
2,318
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T6600
2,187
Core2 Duo P8700
2,628
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T6600
3,331
Core2 Duo P8700
3,995
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T6600
1,371
Core2 Duo P8700
1,639
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T6600
844
Core2 Duo P8700
999
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T6600 | vs | P8700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.6 pt/W | 4.22 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T6600 | vs | P8700 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.25V | 1 - 1.25V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.27 GHz | 2.88 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.7 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 943.9 | 444.7 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.27 GHz | 2.88 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P8700 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $209 | |
350M vs P8700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$331 | $209 | |
T9400 vs P8700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$364 | $209 | |
P9500 vs P8700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | $209 | |
T9600 vs P8700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $209 | |
3632QM vs P8700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$235 | $209 | |
3320M vs P8700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T4500 vs T6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||