Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T6600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T6600

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2.8x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.26 MB More than 7.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core Around 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Apple APL 2298

Reasons to consider the
Apple APL 2298

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Sep, 2009 vs Jan, 2009 Release date 8 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T6600 vs APL 2298

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T6600  vs
APL 2298 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A PowerVR SGX535
GPU clock speed N/A 200 MHz

details

Core2 Duo T6600  vs
APL 2298 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.26 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.26 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
Report a correction
Apple APL 2298
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus