Intel Core2 Duo T6570 vs Celeron 560 |
Released April, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo T6570
- 2.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T6570
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 560 vs the Core2 Duo T6570. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T6570 vs Celeron 560
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T6570 | vs | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| P | |||
| 478 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 31W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.5 pt/W | 2.2 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 25.19W | |
details | Core2 Duo T6570 | vs | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 1 - 1.25V | 0.95 - 1.3V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 533 MHz | |
 Intel Core2 Duo T6570  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 560 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
