0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T5870 vs Celeron T1600 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Core2 Duo T5870
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T5870
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T5870 vs T1600 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron T1600 vs the Core2 Duo T5870. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5870 vs Celeron T1600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5870
1,902
Celeron T1600
1,513
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5870
1,096
Celeron T1600
863
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5870
89,100 MB/s
Celeron T1600
70,550 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5870
1,787
Celeron T1600
1,433
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T5870
3,431
Celeron T1600
1,853
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core2 Duo T5870
1,628
Celeron T1600
1,350
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T5870
1,142
Celeron T1600
931
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T5870
723
Celeron T1600
596
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5870 | vs | Celeron T1600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.36 pt/W | 1.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T5870 | vs | Celeron T1600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.18V | 1.07 - 1.18V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.19 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.19 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T5870 ![]() | Intel Celeron T1600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T2370 vs T1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3455 vs T1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N3450 vs T1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
540 vs T5870 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T7300 vs T5870 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs T5870 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | ||
T9600 vs T5870 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||