Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470S

Intel Core i5 3470S

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T5800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T5800

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470S

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3470S

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 8,949 vs 1,685 More than 5.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,848 vs 677 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per watt 8.97 pt/W vs 2.25 pt/W Around 4x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark score 6,278 vs 1,112 Around 5.8x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.58 GHz vs 2.16 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Oct, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5800 vs Core i5 3470S

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo T5800
84,400 MB/s
Core i5 3470S
2,450,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T5800  vs
Core i5 3470S 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
478
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.25 pt/W 8.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W

details

Core2 Duo T5800  vs
Core i5 3470S 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 10 29

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.16 GHz 3.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.16 GHz 3.58 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo T5800
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3470S
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus