0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T5800 vs Celeron 585 |
Released October, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T5800
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T5800
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 585 vs the Core2 Duo T5800. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5800 vs Celeron 585
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5800
1,869
Celeron 585
1,038
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5800
1,037
Celeron 585
1,044
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5800
84,400 MB/s
Celeron 585
88,950 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5800 | vs | Celeron 585 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 31W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.25 pt/W | 2.76 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 25.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T5800 | vs | Celeron 585 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 13 | |
Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.18V | 0.95 - 1.3V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.17 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T5800 ![]() | Intel Celeron 585 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||