0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T5750 vs Core i3 3217U |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3217U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3217U
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T5750 vs the Core i3 3217U. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5750 vs Core i3 3217U
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5750
1,857
Core i3 3217U
3,037
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5750
1,035
Core i3 3217U
1,441
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5750
84,450 MB/s
Core i3 3217U
93,600 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5750
1,655
Core i3 3217U
2,887
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5750
3,058
Core i3 3217U
3,410
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T5750
3,058
Core i3 3217U
4,546
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T5750
1,090
Core i3 3217U
2,299
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T5750
685
Core i3 3217U
879
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5750 | vs | Core i3 3217U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.25 pt/W | 6.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 13.81W |
details | Core2 Duo T5750 | vs | Core i3 3217U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 18 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.26 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Duo T5750 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3217U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
6010 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
N2830 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1007U vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
450 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $225 | |
3110M vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
6110 vs 3217U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||