Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T5750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T5750

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Core2 Duo T5750.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5750 vs Celeron M 550

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T5750  vs
Celeron M 550 
Clock speed 2 GHz 0.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
P
479
495

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 4W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 0.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 3.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 667 MHz 100 MHz

details

Core2 Duo T5750  vs
Celeron M 550 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.26 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.26 GHz 2.27 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Core2 Duo T5750
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus