0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T5600 vs AMD G G-T56E |
Released August, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T5600
- 1.83 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T5600
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Slightly higher clock speed 1.83 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.16 GHz |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD G G-T56E
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD G G-T56E
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm | ![]() | Newer Jun, 2012 |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 14.63W | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core2 Duo T5600CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly higher clock speed | 1.83 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 651 | vs | 441 | Around 50% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 27.63W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 8.19 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 29.78 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5600 vs G G-T56E
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T5600
1,024
G G-T56E
751
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T5600
651
G G-T56E
441
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5600 | vs | G G-T56E |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core2 Duo T5600 | vs | G G-T56E |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 34W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 29.78 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | 2.23 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 27.63W | 14.63W |
Intel Core2 Duo T5600 ![]() | AMD G G-T56E ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T5600 vs T7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T5600 vs T6670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T5600 vs T7600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T5600 vs T2300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T5600 vs T2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
T5600 vs T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$241 | ||
T5600 vs T2500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||