0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T5500 vs Celeron 560 |
Released August, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T5500
- 1.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo T5500
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 560 vs the Core2 Duo T5500. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5500 vs Celeron 560
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5500
1,595
Celeron 560
981
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5500
877
Celeron 560
988
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5500
70,800 MB/s
Celeron 560
85,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5500
1,488
Celeron 560
948
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T5500
2,485
Celeron 560
1,545
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T5500
921
Celeron 560
533
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T5500
588
Celeron 560
666
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5500 | vs | Celeron 560 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 34W | 31W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.96 pt/W | 2.2 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 27.63W | 25.19W |
details | Core2 Duo T5500 | vs | Celeron 560 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 16 | |
Voltage range | 1.04 - 1.3V | 0.95 - 1.3V | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 533 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo T5500 ![]() | Intel Celeron 560 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
Intel Pentium T2370 vs Core2 Duo T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7200 vs T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
Intel Celeron N2830 vs Core2 Duo T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $177 | |
Intel Pentium P6100 vs Core2 Duo T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
Intel Core Duo T2300 vs Core2 Duo T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
Intel Core Duo T2400 vs Core2 Duo T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $177 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs T5500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||