Intel Core2 Duo T5250 vs Celeron N2840 |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Celeron N2840
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron N2840
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T5250 vs the Celeron N2840. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5250 vs Celeron N2840
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5250 | vs | Celeron N2840 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 311 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 792 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Core2 Duo T5250 | vs | Celeron N2840 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.78 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 2.17 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.78 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 7.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 1.81 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.72 pt/W | 7.05 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 6.09W | |
 Intel Core2 Duo T5250  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron N2840 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $281 | |
| N2840 vs 4010U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $107 | |
| N2840 vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $161 | |
| N2840 vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $17 | |
| N2840 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| N2840 vs N2830 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| N2840 vs 6010 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $275 | |
| N2840 vs 4005U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
