0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo T5200 vs Core Duo T2300 |
VS
Released January, 2006
Intel Core Duo T2300
- 1.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core Duo T2300
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T5200 vs the Core Duo T2300. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5200 vs Core Duo T2300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5200
1,438
Core Duo T2300
1,310
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5200
809
Core Duo T2300
727
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5200
67,500 MB/s
Core Duo T2300
67,300 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo T5200
1,329
Core Duo T2300
1,283
GeekBench
Core2 Duo T5200
1,698
Core Duo T2300
1,719
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo T5200
835
Core Duo T2300
733
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo T5200
538
Core Duo T2300
524
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo T5200 | vs | Core Duo T2300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
M | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 34W | 31W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.82 pt/W | 1.9 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 27.63W | 25.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 667 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo T5200 | vs | Core Duo T2300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 151,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.18V | 1.16 - 1.3V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.01 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 90.3 | 990.3 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 2.01 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo T5200 ![]() | Intel Core Duo T2300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||