CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T5200 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E 350
n.d.
E2 1800
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E 350
n.d.
E2 1800
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD E 350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E 350  based on its performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T5200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T5200

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 67,500 MB/s vs 51,600 MB/s More than 30% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 8.19 $/year vs 12 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo T5200 vs E 350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo T5200
67,500 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,032

GeekBench

E 350
1,861

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo T5200  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 34W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.19 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 29.78 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 1.82 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 27.63W 30.2W

details

Core2 Duo T5200  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 8
Voltage range 1.07 - 1.18V 1.25 - 1.35V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz
Intel Core2 Duo T5200
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus