Intel Core2 Duo SU9400 vs SL9400 |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of SU9400 vs SL9400 among laptop CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the SU9400 vs the SL9400. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the SL9400 vs the SU9400. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo SU9400 vs SL9400
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo SU9400 | vs | SL9400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 956 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.97 pt/W | 4.01 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Core2 Duo SU9400 | vs | SL9400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 7 | 7 | |
| Voltage range | 1.05 - 1.15V | 1.05 - 1.15V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.54 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.4 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.54 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo SU9400  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $262 | |
| 3217U vs SU9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $86 | $262 | |
| B815 vs SU9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $236 | $262 | |
| T8300 vs SU9400 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $247 | ||
| 640LM vs SL9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $247 | ||
| 445 vs SL9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $117 | $247 | |
| 540M vs SL9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | $247 | |
| 2540M vs SL9400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
