0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo SU9400 vs Atom Z2760 |
Released August, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo SU9400
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo SU9400
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Atom Z2760
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z2760
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo SU9400 vs Atom Z2760
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo SU9400
1,362
Atom Z2760
1,080
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo SU9400
817
Atom Z2760
429
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo SU9400
56,500 MB/s
Atom Z2760
28,500 MB/s
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core2 Duo SU9400
1,197
Atom Z2760
16.8
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo SU9400
937
Atom Z2760
571
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo SU9400
585
Atom Z2760
261
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo SU9400 | vs | Atom Z2760 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 2W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 0.48 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.97 pt/W | 16.38 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 1.63W |
details | Core2 Duo SU9400 | vs | Atom Z2760 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.54 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.54 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Integrated | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 533 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Duo SU9400 ![]() | Intel Atom Z2760 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $41 | |
Intel Core i5 3427U vs Atom Z2760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $41 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Atom Z2760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$41 | ||
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33) vs Intel Atom Z2760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $41 | |
Intel Atom Z3740 vs Z2760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$41 | ||
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) vs Intel Atom Z2760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $41 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Z2760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$41 | ||
Nvidia Tegra 4 vs Intel Atom Z2760 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||