Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo SU9300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo SU9300

Report a correction
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Front view of Intel Celeron N2807

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2807

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo SU9300 vs Celeron N2807

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo SU9300  vs
Celeron N2807 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.58 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 956
BGA 1170

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 4.3W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 1.04 $/year
Typical power consumption 8.13W 3.49W

details

Core2 Duo SU9300  vs
Celeron N2807 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.05 - 1.15V 0.4 - 1.14V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.26 GHz 2.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.26 GHz 2.17 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 313 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 750 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo SU9300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2807
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus