0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo P8700 vs Celeron 900 |
Released December, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo P8700
- 2.53 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo P8700
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 900 vs the Core2 Duo P8700. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P8700 vs Celeron 900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8700
2,487
Celeron 900
1,094
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8700
1,395
Celeron 900
1,102
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8700
103,300 MB/s
Celeron 900
88,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8700
2,318
Celeron 900
1,046
GeekBench
Core2 Duo P8700
3,995
Celeron 900
1,767
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core2 Duo P8700
2,253.5
Celeron 900
1,000
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo P8700
1,639
Celeron 900
678
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo P8700
999
Celeron 900
782
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo P8700 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 25W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.22 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Duo P8700 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.88 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.53 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.88 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo P8700 ![]() | Intel Celeron 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $364 | |
P8700 vs P9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $331 | |
P8700 vs T9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $225 | |
P8700 vs 350M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $316 | |
P8700 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $378 | |
P8700 vs 3632QM | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $235 | |
P8700 vs 3320M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$209 | $30 | |
P8700 vs 520M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||