0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5 520M |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 520M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 520M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo P8600 vs the Core i5 520M. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5 520M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8600
2,303
Core i5 520M
3,737
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8600
1,338
Core i5 520M
1,867
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8600
97,400 MB/s
Core i5 520M
1,340,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8600
2,197
Core i5 520M
3,593
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo P8600
2,608
Core i5 520M
4,110
GeekBench
Core2 Duo P8600
3,788
Core i5 520M
5,349
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo P8600
1,541
Core i5 520M
2,380
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo P8600
942
Core i5 520M
1,058
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo P8600 | vs | Core i5 520M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
rPGA 988A | |||
478 | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 25W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.98 pt/W | 13.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Duo P8600 | vs | Core i5 520M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 18 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.77 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.77 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 766 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Duo P8600 ![]() | Intel Core i5 520M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $250 | |
520M vs 2520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $259 | |
520M vs 620M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $235 | |
520M vs 3320M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $60 | |
520M vs 560M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $117 | |
520M vs 540M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $130 | |
P8600 vs 3210M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $80 | |
P8600 vs 3110M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Guest (02:32 AM, December 28, 2016)