Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.26 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.54 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.26 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Apple A7

Reasons to consider the
Apple A7

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Sep, 2013 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 5 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P8400 vs Apple A7

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo P8400
95,500 MB/s
Apple A7
845,850 MB/s

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo P8400  vs
Apple A7 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.54 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.26 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.54 GHz 1.4 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 20.31W N/A

details

Core2 Duo P8400  vs
Apple A7 
Architecture x86-64 ARMv8 64 bits
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A PowerVR G6430
GPU clock speed N/A 600 MHz
Intel Core2 Duo P8400
Report a correction
Apple A7
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus