Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.26 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARMv8 64 bits A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Apple A7

Reasons to consider the
Apple A7

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 28 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Marginally newer Sep, 2013 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 5 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P8400 vs Apple A7

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo P8400  vs
Apple A7 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

gpu

GPU None GPU
Label N/A PowerVR G6430
GPU clock speed N/A 600 MHz

details

Core2 Duo P8400  vs
Apple A7 
Architecture x86-64 ARMv8 64 bits
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 28 nms

power consumption

Typical power consumption 20.31W N/A
Intel Core2 Duo P8400
Report a correction
Apple A7
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus