Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.26 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
More l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Front view of Apple A6X (APL5598)

Reasons to consider the
Apple A6X (APL5598)

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 4 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P8400 vs A6X (APL5598)

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo P8400  vs
A6X (APL5598) 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

gpu

GPU None GPU
Label N/A PowerVR SGX554MP4
GPU clock speed N/A 300 MHz

details

Core2 Duo P8400  vs
A6X (APL5598) 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms

power consumption

Typical power consumption 20.31W N/A
Intel Core2 Duo P8400
Report a correction
Apple A6X (APL5598)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus