Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo P7550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo P7550

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,050 vs 20.3 Around 101x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 92,300 MB/s vs 41,900 MB/s Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,097 vs 827 More than 2.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.26 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 3.81 pt/W vs 2.34 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 20.31W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jul, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 6.02 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 21.9 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P7550 vs E 300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo P7550
92,300 MB/s
E 300
41,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

E 300
1,233

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo P7550  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core2 Duo P7550  vs
E 300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 5
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 488 MHz

power consumption

TDP 25W 18W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 3.81 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 14.63W
Intel Core2 Duo P7550
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus