Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Intel Core M3-6Y30

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo P7350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo P7350

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,785 vs 35.6 Around 50.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.41 GHz vs 2.02 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M3-6Y30

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 22.23 mHash/s vs 1.58 mHash/s More than 14x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 30.69 pt/W vs 3.08 pt/W Around 10x better performance per watt
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 2,388.5 vs 1,137 More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,647.5 vs 1,994 More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Lower typical power consumption 3.66W vs 20.31W 5.6x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 7 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year vs 6.02 $/year 5.6x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year vs 21.9 $/year 5.6x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P7350 vs Core M3-6Y30

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core2 Duo P7350
1.58 mHash/s
Core M3-6Y30
22.23 mHash/s

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo P7350
81,600 MB/s
Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo P7350  vs
Core M3-6Y30 
Clock speed 2 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 25W 4.5W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 1.08 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 3.94 $/year
Performance per watt 3.08 pt/W 30.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 3.66W

details

Core2 Duo P7350  vs
Core M3-6Y30 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.41 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 0.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.41 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 515
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 850 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo P7350
Report a correction
Intel Core M3-6Y30
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus