Intel Core2 Duo P7350 vs AMD Phenom II X4 965 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo P7350
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo P7350
 | Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W | | Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C |
VS
Released November, 2009
AMD Phenom II X4 965
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X4 965
| | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,974 |
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of P7350 vs 965 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Phenom II X4 965CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 152.93W | 7.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 2 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 62 °C | More than 45% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 54.06 $/year | 9x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 152.42 $/year | 7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.08 pt/W | vs | 1.08 pt/W | More than 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 70% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 5,974 | vs | 1,841 | Around 3.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 2.41 GHz | Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 5,916 | vs | 1,301 | More than 4.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,361 | vs | 788 | Around 75% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Newer | Nov, 2009 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo P7350 vs Phenom II X4 965
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo P7350 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| P | |||
| AM3 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 25W | 140W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 54.06 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 152.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.08 pt/W | 1.08 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 152.93W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Core2 Duo P7350 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 758,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 1.06 - 1.15V | 0.85 - 1.43V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 62°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 819.8 | 3,136.7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.41 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo P7350  Report a correction |  AMD Phenom II X4 965 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | $132 | |
| 965 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 965 vs 640 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $165 | |
| 965 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $138 | |
| 965 vs 1055T | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $106 | |
| 965 vs 4300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 965 vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $169 | |
| 965 vs 8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $397 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $360 | $463 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 5200U vs 7410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $238 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
