CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of L7500 vs 450 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo L7500 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo L7500  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo L7500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo L7500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 68,600 MB/s vs 53,200 MB/s Around 30% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 3.87 pt/W vs 2.98 pt/W Around 30% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 5 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo L7500 vs E 450

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 450
1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo L7500
68,600 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 450
1,056

GeekBench

E 450
2,017

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo L7500  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
479
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 100 MHz

details

Core2 Duo L7500  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 25

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6320
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 3.87 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 14.63W
Intel Core2 Duo L7500
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus