Winner
Intel Core2 Duo E8600
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo E8600 based on its .
See full details Intel Core2 Duo E8600 vs E8500 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8600
- 3.33 GHz
- Dual core
3.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8600
 | Higher clock speed 3.33 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.61 GHz |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.6 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
- 3.16 GHz
- Dual core
3.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E8500
| | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Much better performance per watt 1.93 pt/W |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E8600 vs E8500 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 3.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.33 GHz | vs | 3.16 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | vs | 4.46 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.6 GHz | vs | 4.42 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 120.65W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 1.93 pt/W | vs | 1.1 pt/W | Around 75% better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 47.3 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 113.62 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8600 vs E8500
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8600 | vs | E8500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.16 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.62 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.1 pt/W | 1.93 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 120.65W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz | |
details | Core2 Duo E8600 | vs | E8500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 10 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.4°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 9 | 33 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 4.46 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.6 GHz | 4.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | 4.46 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo E8600  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E8500 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | $200 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E8500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $200 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Duo E8500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $287 | $200 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Duo E8500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $285 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E8600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $339 | $285 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 vs Duo E8600 | ||
| | VS | |
| $285 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
