0 Comments
| | Intel Core2 Duo E8600 vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8600
- 3.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8600
| | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
| | Higher clock speed 3.33 GHz |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Phenom II X2 B57
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X2 B57
| | Much lower typical power consumption 65W | | Much lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year |
| | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.33 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 120.65W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 47.3 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 113.62 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E8600 vs Phenom II X2 B57
clock speed
Core2 Duo E8600
3.33 GHz
Phenom II X2 B57
3.2 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Duo E8600
6 MB
Phenom II X2 B57
1 MB
TDP
Core2 Duo E8600
65W
Phenom II X2 B57
80W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8600 | vs | Phenom II X2 B57 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Core2 Duo E8600 | vs | Phenom II X2 B57 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.62 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 120.65W | 65W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 2,200 MHz | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8600 | AMD Phenom II X2 B57 |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $285 | $179 | |
| E8600 vs E8400 | ||
| VS | |
| $285 | $339 | |
| E8600 vs Q9650 | ||
| VS | |
| $285 | ||
| E8600 vs Q6600 | ||
| VS | |
| $285 | $200 | |
| E8600 vs E8500 | ||
| VS | |
| $285 | $287 | |
| E8600 vs Q9550 | ||
| VS | |
| $285 | $125 | |
| E8600 vs 3220 | ||
| VS | |
| $285 | $125 | |
| E8600 vs E7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| VS | |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||





